Role of Modified Biophysical Profile in Prediction of Fetal Asphyxia

  • Nadia Sadiq Women Medical Officer
  • Nargis Shabana Fazaia Medical College,Islamabad
  • Aqsa Ikram Ul Haq Holyfamily hospital,Rawalpindi
  • Shama Bashir Holyfamily hospital,Rawalpindi
  • Nabeela Waheed
  • Jaweria Faisal
Keywords: Modified Biophysical profile, Perinatal outcome, High risk pregnancies, Non stress test

Abstract

Objective   

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Modified Biophysical Profile (MBPP) in determining fetal asphyxia in high risk pregnancies keeping actual birth asphyxia on Apgar Score as gold standard.      

Patients and Methods

After written informed consent from patients, 235 patients with high risk pregnancies admitted to obstetric ward unit 2 Holy Family Hospital were enrolled in study. BPP was done by modified method in high risk patient at > 36 week gestation. Amniotic fluid index was calculated by measuring 4 quadrant vertical pockets and if sum of 4 pockets was< 5 it was considered as abnormal. Total score in MBPP is 4.Out of which 2 score for CTG and 2 score of AFI. These patients were followed till delivery and newborn will be assessed at the time of delivery for fetal asphyxia. Fetal asphyxia was assessed on the basis of Apgar score at 5 min after birth. All patients delivering beyond 7 days of MBPP was excluded from the study.

Results

Mean age (years) in our study was 27.11+1.47 whereas mean parity was 2+1.06 with ranges from nulliparous to para four. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value and negative predicative value of Modified Biophysical Profile (MBPP) in determining fetal asphyxia in high risk pregnancies keeping actual birth asphyxia on Apgar score as gold standard was 95.02%, 71.43%, 98.13% and 47.62% respectively.

Conclusion

MBPP was found to have high sensitivity and positive predictive value in predicting fetal asphyxia as assessed by Apgar score at birth.

Key words:

            Modified Biophysical profile, Perinatal outcome, High risk pregnancies, Non stress test

Author Biographies

Nadia Sadiq, Women Medical Officer

Rawalpindi Medical University

Nargis Shabana, Fazaia Medical College,Islamabad

Associate professor Gynae/Obs

Shama Bashir, Holyfamily hospital,Rawalpindi

Senior Registrar,Rawalpindi Medical University

References

1. Yoshida S. Martines J, Lawn JE, Wall S, Souza JP, Rudan I, et al. Setting research priorities to improve global newborn health and prevent still births by 2025. J Glob Health 2016;6:010508.
2. Housseine, Natasha et al. “Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.” PloS one vol. 13,10 e0206295. 26 Oct. 2018, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206295
3. Anwar, J., Torvaldsen, S., Sheikh, M. et al. Under-estimation of maternal and perinatal mortality revealed by an enhanced surveillance system: enumerating all births and deaths in Pakistan. BMC Public Health 18, 428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5363-3
4. Patel KK, Rai R, Rai AK. Determinants of infant mortality in Pakistan: evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18. Journal of Public Health. 2020 Jan 2:1-9.
5. O'Neill E, Thorp J. Antepartum evaluation of the fetus and fetal well being. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(3):722-730. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e318253b318
6. Sapoval J, Singh V, Carter RE. Ultrasound Biophysical Profile. [Updated 2020 Sep 17]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020
7. Borade JS, Sharma SP. The role of modified biophysical profile in predicting perinatal outcome in high risk pregnancies. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;7(6):2288
8. Simpson L, Khati NJ, Deshmukh SP, Dudiak KM, Harisinghani MG, Henrichsen TL, Meyer BJ, Nyberg DA, Poder L, Shipp TD, Zelop CM. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Assessment of Fetal Well-Being. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2016 Dec 1;13(12):1483-93.
9. Putri RA, Amir RI. EP19. 14: Modified biophysical profile score and middle cerebral artery Doppler as predictor of perinatal outcome in Indonesian tertiary hospital. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019 Oct;54:355

10. Rachel A. Biophysical profile and modified biophysical profile in predicting the fetal outcome. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology.2018;7(9):3517
11. Shaikh AB, Chidre YV. Comparison of the biophysical profile and modified biophysical profile in prediction of the fetal outcome in pregnancy induced hypertension. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;6(4):1207.
12. Raparthy S, Sunitha C. Study of Oligohydramnios Cases by Modified Biophysical Profile and Their Perinatal Outcome. J Dent Med Sci. 2014;1(9):62-69
Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
1.
Sadiq N, Shabana N, Ul Haq A, Bashir S, Waheed N, Faisal J. Role of Modified Biophysical Profile in Prediction of Fetal Asphyxia. JRMC [Internet]. 30Jun.2021 [cited 27Nov.2021];25(2):280-3. Available from: http://journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1625
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)