Morphometric study of vertebral artery groove in dry human cervical vertebra in Pakistani population

  • Mohtasham Hina rawalpindi medical university
  • Maria Tasleem
  • Ammara Rasheed
  • Raafea Tafweez
Keywords: Atlas vertebra, arcuate foramen, vertebral artery groove, posterior bridging, posterior arch of atlas


Introduction: Vertebral artery passes through vertebral artery groove present on the posterior arch of atlas; free movement of which is required during rotation of the neck. This artery can be compressed if the vertebral groove is converted into arcuate foramina due to the projection of bony ponticuli over the grove. This compression can cause vertebra-basilar insufficiency, headache, or neck-shoulder pain of unknown origin.
Objective: This study aims to provide data regarding vertebral artery groove and its morphology to help surgeons and clinicians in the local Pakistani population as no data is available in this population.
Materials and Methods: A total of sixty adult dry human atlas vertebrae were taken from the Anatomy museum of King Edward medical university. Quantitative and qualitative data were taken for analysis. Quantitative data include the distance of medial and lateral edges of vertebral artery groove from the midline of the posterior arch, the distance of the medial edge of foramen transversarium from the midline, the thickness of vertebral artery groove and its dimensions at medial and lateral entrance points. Qualitative data includes the type of bridging over the vertebral artery groove. Data were analyzed and the mean was taken.
Results: Mean distance of the medial edge of vertebral artery groove from midline was found to be 13.32 ± 3.25 and 13.72 ± 2.82 mm on right and left sides respectively while the mean distance of the lateral edge of vertebral artery groove from midline was 22.31 ± 3.47 on the right side and 22.29 ± 2.98 on the left side. The mean of total thickness found was 3.84 ± 0.66 mm on right and 3.57 ± 1.14 mm on left. Morphology showed that 3.33% of the Pakistani population has complete arcuate foramina, 40% partial bridging, and 56.67% absent bridging.
Conclusion: Findings of this study can be helpful for neurosurgeons during procedures requiring exposure of the posterior arch of the atlas so that damage to a vertebral artery can be prevented.


1. Arslan D, Ozer MA, Govsa F, Kitis O. Surgicoanatomical aspect in vascular variations of the V3 segment of vertebral artery as a risk factor for C1 instrumentation. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2019 Oct 1;68:243-9 .

2. Wang HW, Yin YH, Jin YZ, Zong R, Li T, Yu XG, Qiao GY. Morphometric measurements of the C1 lateral mass with congenital occipitalization of the atlas. World neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;121:e1-7.

3. Gupta C, Radhakrishnan P, Palimar V, Kiruba NL. A quantitative analysis of atlas vertebrae and its abnormalities. Journal of Morphological Sciences. 2017 Jan 16;30(2):0-.

4. Sylvia S, Kulkarni S, Hatti A. Bilateral retro articular ring in atlas vertebra a case report. Anatomica Karnataka. 2011;5(1):81-6

5. Lalit M, Mahajan A, Piplani S, Kullar JS. An anatomical study of the morphometric differences between complete arcuate foramina and ipsilateral foramina transversaria in human atlas vertebrae: Could these be responsible for vaso-occlusive symptoms?. National Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2019 Jul;8(03):106-11.

6. Cossu G, Terrier LM, Destrieux C, Velut S, François P, Zemmoura I, Amelot A. Arcuate foramen:“Anatomical variation shape or adaptation legacy?”. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2019 May;41(5):583-8.

7. Krishnamurthy A, Nayak SR, Khan S, Prabhu LV, Ramanathan LA, Ganesh Kumar C, Prasad Sinha A. Arcuate foramen of atlas: incidence, phylogenetic and clinical significance. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2007 May;48(3):263-6.

8. MITCHELL J. The incidence of the lateral bridge of the atlas vertebra. Journal of anatomy. 1998 Aug;193(2):283-5.

9. Stubbs DM. The arcuate foramen. Variability in distribution related to race and sex. Spine. 1992 Dec 1;17(12):1502-4.

10. Hyun G, Allam E, Sander P, Hasiak C, Zhou Y. The prevalence of congenital C1 arch anomalies. European Spine Journal. 2018 Jun;27(6):1266-71.

11. Buyuk SK, Sekerci AE, Benkli YA, Ekizer A. A survey of ponticulus posticus: Radiological analysis of atlas in an orthodontic population based on cone-beam computed tomography. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2017;20(1):106-10.

12. Closs SR, Freire AR, Costa ST, Araujo R, Prado FB, Júnior ED, Rossi AC. Ponticulus posticus: Anatomical Variation in Posterior Arch of the Atlas Vertebra Evaluated in Lateral Cephalometric Radiography. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research. 2017 Jun 5:1-0.

13. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Heck B. The quantitative anatomy of the vertebral artery groove of the atlas and its relation to the posterior atlantoaxial approach. Spine. 1998 Feb 1;23(3):320-3.

14. Vyas K, Joshi HG, Patel S, Shroff B. Study of Ponticulus Posticus in Dry Atlas Vertebrae in Central Gujarat Region and its Clinical Significance.International journal of Anatomy, Radiology and Surgery . 2017 Oct 6(4):AO38-AO41.

15. Taitz C, Nathan H, Arensburg B. Anatomical observations of the foramina transversaria. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1978 Feb 1;41(2):170-6.

16. Stauffer ES. Posterior atlanto-axial arthrodesis: The Gallie and Brooks techniques and their modifications. Techniques in orthopaedics. 1994 Apr 1;9(1):43-8.

17. Awadalla AM, Fetouh FA. Morphometric analysis of the vertebral artery groove of the first cervical vertebra (atlas). Pan Arab J Neurosurg. 2009;13(1):67-70.

18. Naderi S, Çakmakçı H, Acar F, Arman C, Mertol T, Arda MN. Anatomical and computed tomographic analysis of C1 vertebra. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2003 Sep 1;105(4):245-8.
How to Cite
Hina M, Tasleem M, Rasheed A, Tafweez R. Morphometric study of vertebral artery groove in dry human cervical vertebra in Pakistani population. JRMC [Internet]. 30Sep.2021 [cited 4Dec.2021];25(3):429-33. Available from: