Official publication of Rawalpindi Medical University
A comparison of Male and Female Medical Student's Motivation towards Career Choice
PDF

How to Cite

1.
Hina Sattar, Zubaida Zain, Abdul Malik Sheikh, Aniqua Saleem, Muhammad Arshad, Lubna Meraj. A comparison of Male and Female Medical Student’s Motivation towards Career Choice. JRMC [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Apr. 16];25(3). Available from: https://journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1616

Abstract

Objective: To compare motivation to become a doctor in both genders

Study Design: Observational cross-sectional study

Place and Duration of Study:  Rawalpindi Medical University in March 2019.

Materials and Methods: First and second-year M.B.B.S students were included in the study. Age, year of study, and gender were recorded.  The questionnaire included 18 questions assessing six motivational dimensions: status and security; nature of the occupation; career opportunities; patient care and working with people; use of personal skills; and interest in science. Responses were recorded as ‘agree’ or ‘disagree’ for each question and results were analyzed using SPSS v19.

Results: Out of 350 medical students, 247 (70.6%) were female and 103 (29.4%) were male. Most frequent motivational factors for females were “Opportunity to care for/ help people” (n=240; 97.1%) followed by “responsible job” (n=220; 89%) and “use of mental skills” (n=217; 87.8%). Male students were motivated mostly by “use of mental skills” (n=90; 87.3%) followed by “provides secure career” (n=87; 84.4%) and “challenging field” (n=83; 80.5%). In our study, (n=61; 25%) of females responded in agreement that boosts in marriage perspective was an underlying motivational factor for their choice of studying medicine while (n=41; 40%) males agreed to it. There was a significant difference between both genders with a p-value of 0.005. 

Conclusions: We infer that female medical students have more humanitarian grounds for choosing the medical profession and are more motivated than their male counterparts.

https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v25i3.1616
PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Hina Sattar, Zubaida Zain, Abdul Malik Sheikh, Aniqua Saleem, Muhammad Arshad, Lubna Meraj