Success rate of Nasolacrimal Duct Probing in children with Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction after the age of one year

  • Misbah Munshi
  • Kanwal Zareen Abbasi
  • Areeba Zia
  • Wajeeha Rasool
  • Maria Zubair
  • Fuad A. Khan Niazi
Keywords: Children, congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction, Nasolacrimal duct probing, success rate, after one year of age.

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine the success rate of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children after the age of one year.
Materials and Methods: It was a descriptive case series conducted on 145 children presented to Ophthalmology Department, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad with CNLDO. The probing and syringing of the nasolacrimal duct were performed under general anesthesia. The patency of the nasolacrimal system was evaluated by irrigation of saline stained with pyodine through the superior punctum, flow of saline into the nose was confirmed by soaking of throat gauze with pyodine stained fluid and/or oozing of pyodine stained fluid through nose. Patients were advised topical antibiotics and steroids for 3 weeks after the probing and follow-up checkups after 6 weeks. Data were analyzed using SPSS computer software version 17.0. Effect modifier like age and gender was controlled by stratification. The post-stratification chi-square test was applied. P-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results: In our study, the frequency of success of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children between 1 to 2 years was 80.3%, children between 2 to 3 years of age were 53.1%, and children between 3 to 4 years of age were 32.4%.
Conclusion: We concluded that the success rate of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction is higher in children after the age of one year and decreases gradually as the age progresses.

References

1. Bobby G. Anatomy, Developmentand physiology of the lacrimal secretory and drainage system In: American Academy of Ophthalmology. Oculofacial plastic and orbital surgery. 7th sec. San Franciso: American Academy of Ophthalmology 2019;362.
2. Kanski JJ, Bowling B. Lacrimal drainage System. Clinical ophthalmology In: a systematic approach.9th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Saunders; 2020.p108.
3. Serin D, Buttanri IB, Sevim MS, Buttanri B. Primary probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with manually curved Bowman probes. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ). 2013;7:109. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S39926
4. Eshragi B, Fard MA, Masomian B, Akbari M. Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children. Middle East African journal of ophthalmology. 2013 Oct;20(4):349. DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.120018
5. Karim S, Khan MN, Hussain Z, Mohammad S. Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than one year of age.Ophthalmol Update.2011;9:91-3.
6. Arora S, Koushan K, Harvey JT. Success rates of primary probing for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction in children. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2012 Apr 1;16(2):173-6.
7. Thongthong K, Singha P, Liabsuetrakul T. Success of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children under 10 years of age. Medical journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2009 Dec 1;92(12):1646.
8. Galindo-Ferreiro A, Khandekar R, Akaishi PM, Cruz A, Gálvez-Ruiz A, Dolmetsch A, et al. Success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing compared to conventional probing in children 48 months or older. InSeminars in ophthalmology 2018 Apr 3 (Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 435-442). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2017.1284872
9. Kushner BJ. Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nasolacrimal duct intubation in children younger than 4 years of age.2008;12(5):445-50.
10. Kashkouli MZ, Kassaee AF, Tabatabaee Z. Initial nasolacrimal duct probing in children under age 5:Cure rate and factors affecting success.JAAPOS .2002;6(6):360-63
11. Rajab AY.Early probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Annals of the College of Medicine Mosul. 2018;40(1):27-30
12. MannorGE,Rose GE,Ansah KF.Factors affecting the success of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.American journal of ophthalmology. 1999; 127(5)616-7.
13. Lin AE, Chang YC, Lin MY, Tam KW, Shen YD. Comparison of treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmolgy.2016;51(1)34-40.
Published
2021-03-30
How to Cite
1.
Munshi M, Abbasi K, Zia A, Rasool W, Zubair M, Niazi F. Success rate of Nasolacrimal Duct Probing in children with Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction after the age of one year. JRMC [Internet]. 30Mar.2021 [cited 8May2021];25(1):16-0. Available from: https://journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1268