Official publication of Rawalpindi Medical University
Efficacy Of Intralesional Ciprofloxacin In Cutaneous Leishmaniasis As Compared To Intralesional Meglumine Antimoniate

How to Cite

1.
Zafar H, Kausar S, Mazhar H, Nawaz F ul H, Rehman N, Yasmin G. Efficacy Of Intralesional Ciprofloxacin In Cutaneous Leishmaniasis As Compared To Intralesional Meglumine Antimoniate. JRMC [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Jun. 30];30(2). Available from: https://journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/3160

Abstract

Objective: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), a neglected tropical disease, poses a significant therapeutic challenge in endemic regions. Although intralesional meglumine antimoniate (MA) remains a standard treatment, its drawbacks necessitate the exploration of safer and, cheaper alternatives. This within-patient comparative study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intralesional 0.2% ciprofloxacin compared with that of intralesional meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of CL.

Methods: A six-month comparative study was conducted at the Dermatology Department of a tertiary care hospital in, Malir Cantt, Karachi. A total of 128 patients with confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis were enrolled. Only patients presenting with at least two lesions located on the contralateral sides of the body were included. Right-sided lesions were treated with intralesional 0.2% ciprofloxacin (Group A), whereas while left-sided lesions received intralesional meglumine antimoniate (Group B). Injections were administered every fifth day until re-epithelialization commenced. The primary outcome was the proportion of lesions achieving a complete clinical response (>75% reduction in size without induration) at eight weeks post-treatment initiation.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 30.6 ± 7.1 years, with a male predominance (78.9%). The complete response rate was 88.3% (113/128) in the ciprofloxacin group and 91.4% (117/128) in the meglumine antimoniate group. The difference in efficacy was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.486). Stratification by demographic and clinical variables revealed no significant differences in response rates across any subgroup.

Conclusion: Intralesional ciprofloxacin demonstrated comparable efficacy to that of intralesional meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Given its lower cost and favorable safety profile, ciprofloxacin may be a viable alternative therapeutic option, particularly in resource-constrained settings.

Keywords: Cutaneous Leishmaniasis; Ciprofloxacin; Meglumine Antimoniate; Injections, Intralesional; Treatment Outcome

https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v30i2.3160

References

Cosma C, Maia C, Khan N, Infantino M, Del Riccio M. Leishmaniasis in Humans and Animals: A One Health Approach for Surveillance, Prevention and Control in a Changing World. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024;9(11):258. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9110258

Mann S, Frasca K, Scherrer S, Henao-Martínez AF, Newman S, Ramanan P, et al. A Review of Leishmaniasis: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2021;8(2):121–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-021-00232-7

Pareyn M, Alves F, Burza S, Chakravarty J, Alvar J, Diro E, et al. Leishmaniasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025;11:81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-025-00663-w

Knight CA, Harris DR, Alshammari SO, Gugssa A, Young T, Lee CM. Leishmaniasis: Recent epidemiological studies in the Middle East. Front Microbiol. 2023;13:1052478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1052478

Kato H. Epidemiology of Leishmaniasis: Risk factors for its pathology and infection. Parasitol Int. 2025;105:102999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2024.102999

Khan K, Khan NH, Wahid S. Systematic Review of Leishmaniasis in Pakistan: Evaluating Spatial Distribution and Risk Factors. J Parasitol. 2021;107(4):630–638. https://doi.org/10.1645/19-191

Kayani B, Sadiq S, Rashid HB, Ahmed N, Mahmood A, Khaliq MS, et al. Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Pakistan: a neglected disease needing one health strategy. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:622. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06327-w

Aronson NE. Intralesional Antimonial Drug Treatment for Leishmania braziliensis Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: The Knowns and the Unknowns. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;77(4):583–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad248

Barroso DH, Gonçalves RT, Barbosa JS, da Motta J de OC, Freire GSM, Gomes CM, et al. Meglumine antimoniate was associated with a higher cure rate than liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of American tegumentary leishmaniasis: A retrospective cohort study from a Leishmania braziliensis-endemic area. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:993338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.993338

Brito NC, Rabello A, Cota GF. Efficacy of pentavalent antimoniate intralesional infiltration therapy for cutaneous leishmaniasis: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184777

Yazdanpanah M, Zabolinejad N, Andakhshideh E, Mashayekhi-Ghoyonlo V, Rajabi O. The Additive Effect of Topical Ciprofloxacin 2% on Intralesional Glucantime Injection in Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2020;38(571):245–251. https://doi.org/10.22122/jims.v38i571.12789

Arshad AR, Arshad A. Intralesional ciprofloxacin for cutaneous leishmaniasis: Comparison with meglumine antimoniate. Pak J Med Sci. 2011;27(3):566–568. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262011405_Intralesional_ciprofloxacin_for_cutaneous_leishmaniasis_Comparison_with_meglumine_antimoniate

Mapar MA, Omidian M. Intralesional injections of metronidazole versus meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2010;3(2):79–83. Available from: https://brieflands.com/journals/jjm/articles/74430.pdf

Al Hamdi KI, Awad AH, Moker HM. Evaluation of intralesional 0.2% ciprofloxacin as a treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(1):89–93. https://doi.org/10.26719/2010.16.1.89

Al-Hamdi KI, Saadoon AQ. Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with long-pulsed Nd: YAG laser in comparison with intralesional sodium stibogluconate or ciprofloxacin. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2024;34(4):836–845. Available from: https://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/2725

de Vries HJC, Schallig HD. Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A 2022 Updated Narrative Review into Diagnosis and Management Developments. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23(6):823–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-022-00726-8

Husein-ElAhmed H, Gieler U, Steinhoff M. Evidence supporting the enhanced efficacy of pentavalent antimonials with adjuvant therapy for cutaneous leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(10):2216–2228. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16333

Shariati A, Arshadi M, Khosrojerdi MA, Abedinzadeh M, Ganjalishahi M, Maleki A, et al. The resistance mechanisms of bacteria against ciprofloxacin and new approaches for enhancing the efficacy of this antibiotic. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1025633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1025633

Qayyum N, Gul P, Zainab A, Jawaid M, Azam M, Sattar S. Comparison of Intralesional Meglumine Antimoniate Plus Oral Allopurinol with Intralesional Meglumine Antimoniate Alone for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis- A Prospective Study. Life Sci. 2024;5(2):181–186. https://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.511.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Humna Zafar, Sameena Kausar, Hina Mazhar, Faiz ul Hassan Nawaz, Naila Rehman, Ghazala Yasmin