Official publication of Rawalpindi Medical University
Surgical Techniques For Adenoidectomy: A Comparative Analysis Of ‘‘Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy” And ‘‘Endoscopic Assisted Microdebrider Adenoidectomy”

Keywords

Adenoidectomy
Adenoids
Endoscopy
microdebrider
conventional

How to Cite

1.
Saeed A, Khan MY, Ali M, Jamalullah M, Riaz Y. Surgical Techniques For Adenoidectomy: A Comparative Analysis Of ‘‘Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy” And ‘‘Endoscopic Assisted Microdebrider Adenoidectomy”. JRMC [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Jun. 30];30(2). Available from: https://journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/3134

Abstract

Objective: To compare mean intraoperative blood loss, mean operative time, and frequency of post-operative adenoid remnant with ‘‘conventional curettage adenoidectomy” versus “endoscopic assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy”.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of ENT - Head and Neck Surgery, KRL Hospital, Islamabad, from February 2023 to December 2023. 40 patients of both genders with adenoidal hypertrophy aged 5 to 12 years of age were included. In group-C, adenoidectomy was performed by the conventional curettage method, while in group-E ‘‘endoscopic assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy” was performed. Intraoperative blood loss and duration of surgery were noted. One month post-operatively, patients were assessed for adenoid remnant by nasal endoscopy.

Results: This study includes 23 males and 17 females. The age range was 5 -12 years. The mean duration of surgery was 27.75 ± 3.67 min and 39.10 ± 4.24 min in Group C and Group E, respectively. Mean intra-operative blood loss was 20.25 ± 3.04 ml and 28.90 ± 4.44 ml in Group C and Group E, respectively. The frequency of postoperative adenoid remnant was 45.0 % and 15.0% in Group C and Group E, respectively.

Conclusion: Both techniques are effective and safe for adenoidectomy. However, the chances of adenoid remnant are lower in ‘‘endoscopic assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy”.

Key words: Adenoidectomy, Adenoids, Operative time, Hemorrhage, Nasopharynx.

https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v30i2.3134

References

Niedzielski A, Chmielik LP, Mielnik-Niedzielska G, Kasprzyk A, Bogusławska J. Adenoid hypertrophy in children: a narrative review of pathogenesis and clinical relevance. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023;7(1):e001710. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001710

Ma Y, Xie L, Wu W. The effects of adenoid hypertrophy and oral breathing on maxillofacial development: a review of the literature. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024;48(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2024.001

Hu R, Xia L, Shi C, Zhou Y, Guo X. Otitis media with effusion in preschool children with adenoid hypertrophy: risk factors and nursing care. Nurs Open. 2024;11(5):e2165. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2165

Ahmad Z, Krüger K, Lautermann J, Lippert B, Tenenbaum T, Tigges M, et al. Adenoid hypertrophy-diagnosis and treatment: the new S2k guideline. HNO. 2023:67-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-023-01299-6

Giri O, Shenoy SV, Parvathareddy N, Puvvula P, Shetty D, Reddy N. Assessment of middle ear function after conventional or endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023;43(6):417-23. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2593

Sun YL, Yuan B, Kong F. Comparison between different approaches applied in pediatric adenoidectomy: a network meta-analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023;132(2):207-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894221081612

Wadhera R, Vashist A, Kumar P, Ghai A. Endoscopic adenoidectomy with microdebrider. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(Suppl 2):1314-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02416-z

Beemrote DS, Aseri Y, Rawat DS, Mahich S, Verma PC. A comparative study of endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy versus conventional adenoidectomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;75(3):1598-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03633-4

Manhas M, Deva FAL, Sharma S, Koul D, Gul N, Jamwal PS, et al. Endoscopic adenoidectomy replacing the outdated curette adenoidectomy: comparison of the two methods at a tertiary care centre. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(Suppl 3):4788-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03089-y

Wadia J, Dabholkar Y. Comparison of conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic powered adenoidectomy: a randomised single-blind study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(Suppl 2):1044-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02122-2

Modi AT, Raval JB, Aiyer RG, Shah PC. Comparative study between conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider assisted adenoidectomy: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(Suppl 2):875-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01944-4

Tulaci KG, Arslan E, Tulaci T, Dinek A, Yazici H. Comparison of transnasal and transoral routes of microdebrider combined curettage adenoidectomy and assessment of endoscopy for residue: a randomized prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(3):797-805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06385-x

Omer GL, Abdullah AS, Ali SS, Di Girolamo S, Viola S, Bravetti A, et al. Residual adenoid tissue after conventional adenoidectomy and the role of intraoperative nasal endoscopy: a prospective cohort study. Children (Basel). 2025;12(10):1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12101393

Wang L, Ji K, Tu J. Comparative outcomes of microdebrider adenoidectomy, curettage adenoidectomy through oral cavity under 70 endoscope, and endoscopic transoral low-temperature ablation for adenoid hypertrophy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024;186:112143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112143

Inada H, Hirata M, Kimura A, Ito S, Shikano K, Kaneko M, et al. Comparison of classical method and microdebrider technique for adenoidectomy in pediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Fujita Med J. 2024;10(2):49-52. https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2023-009

Yanılmaz M, Akduman D. A comparative study of two adenoidectomy technics for efficacy and safety: conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy. Am J Otolaryngol. 2023;44(4):103807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103807

Kole AS, Nilakhe SS, Dorkar SN, Basu I. Conventional curettage adenoidectomy vs endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy: a comparative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025;282(1):529-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09037-6

Malas M, Althobaiti AA, Sindi A, Bukhari AF, Zawawi F. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;52(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00634-9

Liu T, Ji C, Sun Y, Bai W. Adverse events of coblation or microdebrider in pediatric adenoidectomy: a retrospective analysis in 468 patients. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022;7(6):2154-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.949

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Ayesha Saeed, Muhammad Yasir Khan, Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Jamalullah, Yousra Riaz